My vForum :: Customization :: Coding :: Discussion :: View Topic - CSS 3.0 vs CSS 2.0 |
Official Designer
Reputation: 1% | ![[Avatar]](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v215/fullphaser/Personal/avatartester-2.jpg)
Star Fool
| Joined: 18th May 2008
Gender: Male
Chattanooga, TN
|
| CSS 3.0 vs CSS 2.0 (3rd Jun 08 at 2:22am)
or CSS 1.0 | | Any preference or CSS that you like to stick too? Forgiving of course that CSS 3 is still not completed nor valid.
http://fullphaser.freeweb7.com/ - Me playing around with CSS 3.0's transparency and using CSS to accomplish (to some degree) the idea of rounded corners. | | Back to Top - Link to Post |
If necessity is the mother of invention, than want must be the father
[ Phaser Labs | Fullphaser's Rants ] |
|
Lead Coder
Administrator
Official Coder
Reputation: 4% | ![[Avatar]](http://av.wrighty.info/av.png)
| Joined: 17th May 2008
Gender: Male
|
| | Re: CSS 3.0 vs CSS 2.0 (3rd Jun 08 at 8:30am) | | CSS2 until 3 becomes valid... Round corners is possible with CSS2!  | | Back to Top - Link to Post |
 |
|
Official Designer
Reputation: 1% |
Star Fool
| Joined: 18th May 2008
Gender: Male
Chattanooga, TN
|
| | Re: CSS 3.0 vs CSS 2.0 (3rd Jun 08 at 8:35am) | | 3rd Jun 08 at 8:30am, Wrighty said:| CSS2 until 3 becomes valid... Round corners is possible with CSS2! |
True, I was only using the whole CSS 3 bit for transparency and maybe if I'm really nice for Christmas they'll introduce better vertical control in CSS 3... Or really, they'll have the XHTML strict assign the body a height at load, that'd be nice. | | Back to Top - Link to Post - Last edit: 3rd Jun 08 at 8:35am by fullphaser |
If necessity is the mother of invention, than want must be the father
[ Phaser Labs | Fullphaser's Rants ] |
| |
|
